
Re: Long Distance Stage Race Idea For 2011
Great ideas Marion! These shorter distances would definitely draw a larger crowd, and your organizational skills would make something like this really go off. If anything, I've gone the route of anti-organizing ultras here, partly because they've just been a tiny friends/family thing, in part because I'm just not all that organized, but mostly because setting up insurance and EMT and porta-potties for a group has seemed daunting--and our numbers haven't been large enough to warrant the expense yet. I know growing a scene is all chicken & egg stuff, but I guess at heart I've always been more of a participant looking for an organizer.
We've actually had more point-to-point ultras in the past, which I personally really dig. That's the course that both Paul and Ted set their top records on, with 50-mile round trips done twice, then up a 2-mile hill to a loop track for the overnight hours, here's the course in Seattle:

The logistical challenge was that noobs were not adequately prepared for 50-mile unsupported stretches (we operated on a shoestring with "bring your own volunteers" policy), also for out-of-towners just knowing the path was a little tricky so to keep it low-cost and low-org I created some trail guides like this link.
http://pavedwave.myfastforum.org/about20.html Also, this path is a really nice *mostly* non-motorized bike trail, but there are actually quite a number of intersections and a few busy ones, which create some time delays and force "competitors" to wait sometimes (or else blow traffic lights), and of course it scared me a bit more liability-wise to have younger kids join events who might not be as savvy to looking both ways before crossing, lots of crazy-fast and oblivious SUV drivers here. In the end I've found that the camaraderie and spectating overnight at the loop track always created the biggest draw, even though it's less adventurous. I do think a loop should be at least around 3 miles long to keep any loop format more interesting.
We've tossed about the idea of 100-mile centuries before, that's actually where the subsonic board got it's name. The thing I like about a century is that it falls into an established distance, and that appeals to me to see how our times stack up against all the 100-mile data from bikers, runners, etc.
The reason I haven't focused much on centuries is mainly due to a bunch of personal biases and non-competitive philosophy on distances which if I start pontificating about here will help everyone fall asleep (if they're not already.) But -- part of the reason I make the ultraskate list start at the 100-mile mark is that I've found that 100 miles in a day is a reasonable, encouraging and attainable goal for a LOT of people, who just don't know it yet
So I'm curious if having a century on day one, followed by a more "fun" 40 or 50-miler the next day that has sections of downhill involved, ending in a party / BBQ, might also be a compelling weekend format? I think if we did try to organize a century, the fast times would be in the 7-8 hour range and there should be a 12-hour ceiling.
Venue...somewhere warm with less chance of rain and hail and goose poop than Seattle?

Lakesides are nice, a good combo of fresh air and scenery and if the lake is really huge, then full loop or two might add up to significant mileage.
There's also this amazing place in Germany called Flaeming-skate which might work --
http://pavedwave.myfastforum.org/about430.html -- though since it seems like a huge maze of trails I'm not sure if it's more or less confusing for a "point to point" format.